http://regexlib.com/ A Library of Regular Expressions Copyright © 2001-2005, ASPSmith.com RegexLibRssFeed v1.0 Jamie Phelps http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=213&commentId=39193 Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:01:35 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=213&commentId=39193 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=213&commentId=39193#comments There is no sense in limiting the password to "predefined wild characters." You should be validating at most the presence of 1 or more letters, 1 or more digits, and 1 or more special characters along with a minimum length. sip http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=610&commentId=39192 Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:27:36 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=610&commentId=39192 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=610&commentId=39192#comments hi, can someone pls change the format to dd/mm/yy hh:mm. It's over my knowing 10x Neil Banton http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=409&commentId=39191 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:16:40 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=409&commentId=39191 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=409&commentId=39191#comments Nice one - very useful, seems to work fine so far. wetek_wetek_wetek_wetek http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1517&commentId=39190 Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:12:48 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1517&commentId=39190 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1517&commentId=39190#comments wetek_wetek_wetek_wetekwetek_wetek_wetek_wetek Ted Cambron http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39189 Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:55:14 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39189 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39189#comments I don't understand what's going on with this. It works using the regex coach but not on the tester here. I wonder what it could be. Ted Cambron http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39188 Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:55:04 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39188 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39188#comments I don't understand what's going on with this. It works using the regex coach but not on the tester here. I wonder what it could be. Ted Cambron http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39187 Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:53:38 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39187 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39187#comments I don't understand what's going on with this. It works using the regex coach but not on the tester here. I wonder what it could be. Ted Cambron http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39186 Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:49:57 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39186 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2092&commentId=39186#comments I don't understand what's going on with this. It works using the regex coach but not on the tester here. I wonder what it could be. dsfsad http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39185 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:15:35 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39185 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39185#comments sdagfasdg dsfsad http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39184 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:14:50 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39184 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39184#comments sdagfasdg dsfsad http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39183 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:12:55 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39183 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=735&commentId=39183#comments sdagfasdg ashish jain http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1883&commentId=39182 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:54 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1883&commentId=39182 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1883&commentId=39182#comments hi buddy your expression is good but not very good it, should be contains +91 also,i think you got the point. bye & tc. Your bro ashish Giulio Di Gio Battista http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=333&commentId=39181 Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:09:49 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=333&commentId=39181 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=333&commentId=39181#comments by using the .net RegEx if you give "Arnet1006522192MAI@INTERCHEMISTRY" as input the method IsMatch will hang indefinetely Please let me know if you solve the problem Regards, Giulio Di Gio Battista (giulio211271@hotmail.com) Gary http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1573&commentId=39180 Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:31:36 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1573&commentId=39180 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1573&commentId=39180#comments this is great, it even checks leap years, days, very very nice, thanks chris bigtall http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1004&commentId=39179 Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:09:19 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1004&commentId=39179 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1004&commentId=39179#comments ((\w+)\:\/+)?(([\w\-]+(\.[\w\-]+)+)(\:\d+)?)([\w\-\/\.\?;&]+)? this is my pattern Fellow Canadian http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1293&commentId=39178 Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:18:19 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1293&commentId=39178 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=1293&commentId=39178#comments Thanks for the regex, I just learned some details about Canadian Postal Codes that I didn't know about the exceptions your account for! jmlmartin http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=596&commentId=39177 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:39:35 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=596&commentId=39177 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=596&commentId=39177#comments As I understand it, I, U, Z and O registrations were never issued for either the suffix or prefix series. GLB http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=587&commentId=39176 Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:37:30 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=587&commentId=39176 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=587&commentId=39176#comments It's wrong, it works on some phone numbers only by luck. You confused curly brackets with square brackets, and there's an abnormal use of pipes. This one is correct: ^([+]39)?((38[[8-9]0])|(34[[7-9]0])|(36[680])|(33[[3-9]0])|(32[8-9]))([\d]{7})$ Check the syntax here: http://www.regextester.com/jssyntax.html Best regards. R.Delpak http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2371&commentId=39175 Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:30:48 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2371&commentId=39175 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=2371&commentId=39175#comments this is not correct. you must change it a bit. correct is : (^(09|9)[1][1-9]\d{7}$)|(^(09|9)[3][12456]\d{7}$) andy http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=606&commentId=39174 Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:36:00 GMT http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=606&commentId=39174 http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=606&commentId=39174#comments Great expression for all currencies. Thanks, just what I needed. http://api.feedburner.com/awareness/1.0/GetFeedData?uri=Regexlibcom-RecentComments