| Title | Test
                    Find
                    
                    Date | 
            
                | Expression | ^(\d{4}(?:(?:(?:\-)?(?:00[1-9]|0[1-9][0-9]|[1-2][0-9][0-9]|3[0-5][0-9]|36[0-6]))?|(?:(?:\-)?(?:1[0-2]|0[1-9]))?|(?:(?:\-)?(?:1[0-2]|0[1-9])(?:\-)?(?:0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01]))?|(?:(?:\-)?W(?:0[1-9]|[1-4][0-9]5[0-3]))?|(?:(?:\-)?W(?:0[1-9]|[1-4][0-9]5[0-3])(?:\-)?[1-7])?)?)$ | 
            
                | Description | This is a regular expression to check for a properly formatted date according to the international date and time notation ISO 8601. Remember, this is just for the date. See ISO 8601 specification for more information. | 
            
                | Matches | ISO 8601 date format | 
            
                | Non-Matches | non-ISO date format | 
            
                | Author | Rating:  tedcambron | 
            
                | Source |  | 
            
              | Your Rating |  | 
        
    
 
    
    
     
        
                
	                Title: Works Perfectly
	                Name: Ted Cambron
	                Date: 9/24/2014 8:14:36 PM
	                Comment: 
I just tested this beauty again and it works perfectly as intended.
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Leap years and short-long months
	                Name: Robajz
	                Date: 8/28/2011 10:39:54 AM
	                Comment: 
Hi, Thanks for the pattern. I have expanded it to support leap years and short-long months here: http://regexlib.com/REDetails.aspx?regexp_id=3344
Regards, Rob
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Hmm...
	                Name: Ted Cambron
	                Date: 11/16/2008 10:55:14 AM
	                Comment: 
I don't understand what's going on with this. It works using the regex coach but not on the tester here. I wonder what it could be.
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Hmm...
	                Name: Ted Cambron
	                Date: 11/16/2008 10:55:04 AM
	                Comment: 
I don't understand what's going on with this. It works using the regex coach but not on the tester here. I wonder what it could be.
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Hmm...
	                Name: Ted Cambron
	                Date: 11/16/2008 10:53:38 AM
	                Comment: 
I don't understand what's going on with this. It works using the regex coach but not on the tester here. I wonder what it could be.
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Hmm...
	                Name: Ted Cambron
	                Date: 11/16/2008 10:49:57 AM
	                Comment: 
I don't understand what's going on with this. It works using the regex coach but not on the tester here. I wonder what it could be.
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Does not work :(
	                Name: Mike
	                Date: 10/6/2008 4:06:46 PM
	                Comment: 
Try a few examples from this note:
http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
Unfortunately most of them are rejected by this REGEX
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Doesn't work
	                Name: Michael Newman
	                Date: 5/23/2008 3:03:37 PM
	                Comment: 
This doesn't match iso 8601 format
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Updated
	                Name: Ted Cambron
	                Date: 2/12/2008 10:41:16 PM
	                Comment: 
I updated it so that the day of year is 001 - 366, the week number is 01 - 53, and day of week number is 1 - 7. I also updated the month and day part to restrict it to more realistic numbers.
                
                
            
                
	                Title: Can be improved
	                Name: Ted Cambron
	                Date: 2/9/2008 8:55:58 PM
	                Comment: 
I just noticed that even though the formatting is to specification it will allow unrealistic dates. Can be improved.